this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
395 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

85645 readers
3224 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Stock that has existed for exactly two weeks moves in any direction

"The people who bought this IPO are going to have their lives changed forever."

[–] arin@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Gonna be funny when every rocket lauch failure tanks the stock, they should have stayed private lmfao

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

stayed private, and never merged with xAI/Twitter

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

What a facade this "corporation" shit is. So the "stake holders" had literally the #1 space company in the world and agreed to merge it with two failing products in their own respective niches?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Pretty much yep. Elon has a controlling interest in SpaceX so I think that was just his outright decision, unless he had to abstain and let the investors decide? I'm not sure if he had a controlling stake in xAI.

Edit: You also left off 'overvalued' when referring to xAI/Twitter. I think SpaceX honestly could have grown into it's individual valuation pre-merger.

[–] optimisticturtle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if the opposite happened given how this gimp's companies are known for being divorced from the fundamentals.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think people might see that sometimes, but not understand why, because they just see a starship blows up headlines and don't understand what is happening as it's a test program (for now), and the headlines / stories don't convey that.

So when things explode, sometimes it's fine, and the stock might go up because a lot of really important things still were tested, some for the first time, and they went well.

Other times, things will explode and it can cause huge delays, and while they learn something, it's still 'bad' compared to the above blow ups, and the stock will very likely go down when these ones happen.

And then sometimes, something goes wrong on the test pad and you blow it up, and that is very bad. It's a test pad, its meant for that, but it causes huuuuuge delays.

But OP is right, they brought this new chaos upon themselves by going public. They really shouldn't have done it yet.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a weird way of saying a stock started at $135 and is now at $181 a week later, but some people bought it when it was higher than that for a few days.

I mean seriously? I want spacx to fail super hard and musk to get completely dumped on, but this amount of volatility is completely typical when well known companies start an IPO. It sucks it's like 35% higher than the initial offering price.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't worry. We all get to prop up this failing stock in the next few days, when the Indexes start getting forcibly loaded up with Elmo's latest meme stock. Then the disease will just be endemic in our portfolios.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't own any ai effected tech stock, but I know my entire portfolio will go down when the ai bubble bursts. Sucks. Not sure if I'll try and sell off and buy the dip back in, or just ride it out, yet.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

The good news is that all of the SpaceX top valuation won't actually drag all of our Collective portfolios if it were to collapse, it will sting a bit but all of us invested in, say, VTI and VOO, can absorb that much stupid.

I wonder what happens if there's a handful of companies immediately behind it they look just like it though. Thankfully S&P 500 has said that they will not index SpaceX until they actually earn it through profitability.

I own a tremendous amount of AI affected tech stocks relative to the rest of my portfolio, and I'm trying to divest but doing so bleeds me through additional capital gains taxes for my state, which I wholeheartedly believe should exist as long as the billionaires have to pay them, too. It's just a difficult calculation for how much risk I want to wear versus how much capital gains I want to incur to make my way towards the exits to put my money in more boring things.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

We all get to prop up this failing stock in the next few days, when the Indexes start getting forcibly loaded up

Indexes won't start buying into these stocks for a few more months. And they aren't forced to buy. They set their own policies, they answer to their own boards, and they can absolutely choose to avoid this stock if they choose.

I would say the bigger threat is SPCX stock undergoing the same manipulation and price-pumping we saw happen with Tesla. When the SEC is fully castrated, the Feds have already acknowledged SpaceX is "Too Big To Fail", and the big banks all have oodles of shares leveraged to the hilt, there's a vested interest across the board in this stock going up up up forever.

Then the disease will just be endemic in our portfolios.

The disease is the stock market as a whole. Asset inflation creates malinvestment. The fixation on economic growth means we'll immolate useful capital in the name of the Big Number Going Up. And disproportionate ownership stakes cause property to congeal into fewer and fewer hands with every generation.

Our portfolios aren't at risk, because our porfolios are less and less important to the final valuation of these markets. This is six big companies sucking each other off in an ouroboros of graft and fraud. If the markets went to zero tomorrow, we'd be far better off over the long run than if this post-COVID bull run never ends.

[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 106 points 2 days ago (1 children)

After briefly pushing SpaceX’s market value close to $3 trillion, investors have begun reassessing whether the stock’s rapid advance can be justified by fundamentals.

Nothing in the stock market has been about fundamentals for a very long time. Especially regarding Musk companies.

[–] Benaaasaaas@group.lt 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe Uber was the company to break the fundamentals game

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The entire fundamentals game was broken back in around 2012 when, in the aftermath of the 2008 Crash, Central Bank meetings setting interest rates became more important in setting the direction the Stock Market took (up if they lowered interest rates, down if they did not) than fundamentals.

It just so happens that the period when Uber rose coincided with that period of high interventionism by Central Banks which lasted almost a decade since their solutions for the 2008 Crash did not address the underlying causes and the recovery following that Crash was one of the slowest post-Crash recoveries ever (in fact, Interest Rates and GDP Growth are still not back to their historical trends).

It wasn't Uber who broke the Financial System's reflection of real wealth creation, it was Zero Interest Rate Policy flooding the Economy with pretty much free money and Too Big To Fail meaning that certain Financial Institutions could do every Financial Crime they felt like and never really be punished for it and take any risk they felt like because Central Bank money was always there in the background to save them if they went too far.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 179 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Boo hoo my shares in a company owned by a fascist and with absolutely awful revenue in comparison to it's valuation are losing value just as expected

cry me a river

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 days ago

All of this.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 days ago (9 children)

It's up 35% from its starting IPO pricing......

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

This is normal for an IPO look at the history of ASTS or RKLB they very similar to SPCX and have a lot of volatility.

I’ve made a lot of money on both. But I refuse to invest in companies owned by fascist pricks who has gleefully killed people and has boasted about it.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 87 points 2 days ago

So the pump dumped?

Wow. Such surprise. /s

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Saying the average buyer is almost underwater is another way of saying that the average buyer has made a profit.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 8 points 2 days ago

The media does this constantly with Elon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bought some around 150 when the IPO first hit, I watched it jump to ~200, and then I got scared and sold it the following Monday around 190-ish. It's been holding around 185, but I'm just not sure what's going to happen with the stock.

Don't pay attention to me I'm just a guy on the Internet.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Back when Facebook stock took a slide after the initial IPO, I bought at $25 and sold at $50 a year later, thinking I had absolutely cleaned up.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Yup I went back and forth of whether or not to keep my shares but it was only like three so I wasn't going to be a millionaire anyway.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I mean, is it really an IPO if it isn't insanely overpriced when initially offered?

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I would say it's quite usual to see a big dip right from the start. It's just hamsters for whom buying Space X is their first trade don't know about that

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh look, the completely expected and basically dependable event that happens after EVERY IPO, happened. Anyone jumping on an initial IPO is a fucking idiot. They always go under.

They might eventually still make it back to be profitable if they wait months or even years... or they could have waited a few weeks and bought the inevitable dip and never been underwater in the first place, making more profit.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

...in USA america, initial IPOs are ATM machines to fund CD deposits...

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The only IPO I ever jumped on was ARM Holdings, and that actually ended up doubling within a couple weeks. Made a tidy profit on it, then dumped it when it plateaued.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bet you wish you held it now though. Up about 7x since it first opened.

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Man, I was having a good day, too...

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

A win is a win!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

$185 is still way above the already ridiculous IPO price of $135. If this market made any sense, it wouldn't have gotten this high in the first place, but since we're here, it should really continue dropping. However, knowing how this market is, I wouldn't be surprised if this is just a momentary dip before going back up for some dumb made-up reason.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah, unerring faith in the magical powers of Elon continues to be a hell of a drug. Tesla does not remotely justify its current valuation either.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That was the entire point of the IPO wasn't it? Funnel money to Elon and his friends and leave the rest of the (less connected) idiot investors holding the bag? Anyone who didn't own before it could sell wasn't one of the in-crowd that was supposed to be handed money. If you did buy, you weren't buying based on any business fundamentals and should have known to sell as soon as any gain could be realized which would have been hours or even minutes after buying.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Someone more knowledgeable than me please correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think any of the original private investors have been capable of selling anything and I don't think they will be able to for another 30 or 60 days.

And IMO, I think Elon is thoroughly convinced that he will have another Tesla stock situation on his hand, where it generally keeps going up unreasonably for many many years.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's a lockup period ya. I heard they reduced the duration though, but it's typically 6 months.

Anyone who bought at $135 the money went into SpaceX's balance sheet.

For now, anyone buying after the $135 is buying from people who bought those $135 shares.

Mark Cuban is famous for having zero cost collared his shares that he couldn't sell and getting out of the dotcom bubble with his money since it protected him from the downside that happened, so maybe it's possible they've done that here as well?

load more comments
view more: next ›