this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
268 points (98.2% liked)

Not The Onion

18017 readers
1903 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Looks like Tuco finally met his match!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A lot of states have very strict assault laws. For instance, in MA, Assault with a Dangerous Weapon can be brought against a person if they hit, throw, or spray pretty much any object or substance, including self-defense things like pepper spray.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 35 points 4 days ago (7 children)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 45 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're not thinking like a lawyer.

"Your honor, the defendant viciously and recklessly launched a dangerous substance - known to scientists as 'dihydrogen monoxide' - at my client. This chemical compound is commonly used in industrial cleaning operations and as a coolant in nuclear reactors. We seek damages up to $10,000,000,000 for pain and suffering."

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

It doesn't even have what plants crave your honor!!!

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Have you considered she's maybe a ground type

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

Or, Arceus forbid, a Charmander. If that tail flame goes out it dies!

[–] radix@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

People who have been sprayed with dihydrogen monoxide have a 100% rate of dying.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Think about the reaction you can get spraying people with water. They’ll cry out, close their eyes, shield their faces and run away.

I don’t know if you can call it “battery” which is often what people mistakenly expect from a definition of assault. It’s assault if you run up to someone with your fist pulled back like you’re going to punch them. It’s battery when you punch them.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Water, where the sharks and kraken live? That water? Seems pretty dangerous to me!!!

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Water? Eugh. Never touch the stuff. Fish fuck in it.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Starski@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can't be too careful with that dihydrogen monoxide, 100% of people that drink it eventually die

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The more that someone drinks it, the higher their likelihood of dying.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's worse than that too. People become addicted to it and withdrawals will kill them in a matter of days.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 2 points 4 days ago

It's the primary component in acid rain! In its gaseous form, it can cause severe burns from only brief contact! And would you believe that autopsies reveal this dangerous compound in the bodies of almost all deceased people? It should be outlawed!

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The other comments are joking, but I bet a "serious" (legally, not realistically) that the defendant didn't know if it was safe or not. Maybe the water had some dangerous chemicals in it? We all know that the argument would be bullshit, but I would bet that's what they'd say. Or a potential alternative would be that the intent was to have her fall and get hurt, or something like that.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But it was from a hose. From the account it sounds like he asked her to move, she didn't, so he sprayed her a bit.

Even in her own admission she says she thinks it was intentional, which means that it could have also been accidental.

The correct response to a neighbor spraying you with a hose is to go inside and wipe off, not file a police report.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

I'm not talking about the "correct" response. I said it wouldn't be a reasonable argument. I was talking about the argument that will be made in court. It'll be bullshit, but I bet it'll be something along the lines I said above.