this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
728 points (97.5% liked)

Greentext

5608 readers
1072 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nikki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i like lens flare its pretty

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like lense flare for a bit if I'm just enjoying the scenery or whatever. If I'm actually playing the game though, turn that shit off so I can actually see

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 2 points 22 hours ago

You are supposed to not see

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] JakJak98@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I feel like bloom depends on how intense it is, and if it makes sense to reasonably play the game.

Like, if it's the sun, yeah, bloom is OK.

If it's anything else? Pass.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i need some motion blur on otherwise i get motion sickness.

[–] Reziarfg@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, I've been turning it off to prevent motion sickness. 🤔

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

My friend is the same way as you haha.

[–] Yaarmehearty@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The preference against DOF is fine. However, I’m looking at my f/0.95 and f/1.4 lenses and wondering why it’s kind of prized in photography for some genres and hated in games?

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Different mediums. Different perception. Games are a different kind of immersion.

[–] ne0phyte@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is unnatural. The focus follows where you are looking at. Having that fixed based on the mouse/center of the screen instead of what my eyes are doing feels so wrong to me.

I bet with good eye tracking it would feel different.

[–] Yaarmehearty@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

That makes sense, if you can’t dynamically control what is in focus then it’s taking a lot of control away from the player.

I can also see why a dev would want to use it for a fixed angle cutscene to create subject separation and pull attention in the scene though.

[–] Baguette@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Depth of field and chromatic aberration are pretty cool if done right.

Depth of field is a really important framing tool for photography and film. The same applies to games in that sense. If you have cinematics/cutscenes in your games, they prob utilize depth of field in some sense. Action and dialogue scenes usually emphasize the characters, in which a narrow depth of field can be used to put focus towards just the characters. Meanwhile things like discovering a new region puts emphasis on the landscape, meaning they can use a large depth of field (no background blur essentially)

Chromatic aberration is cool if done right. It makes a little bit of an out of place feel to things, which makes sense in certain games and not so much in others. Signalis and dredge are a few games which chromatic aberration adds to the artstyle imo. Though obviously if it hurts your eyes then it still plays just as fine without it on.

Chromatic aberration is also one of the few effects that actually happens with our eyes instead of being an effect designed to replicate a camera sensor.

Except I hate not being able to see my entire field of view clearly, why did we fight so hard for graphics only to blur that shit out past 50 feet?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And film grain. Get that fake static out of here

[–] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most "film grain" is just additive noise akin to digital camera noise. I've modded a bunch of games for HDR (RenoDX creator) and I strip it from almost every game because it's unbearable. I have a custom film grain that mimic real film and at low levels it's imperceptible and acts as a dithering tool to improve gradients (remove banding). For some games that emulate a film look sometimes the (proper) film grain lends to the the look.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Agreed. It fits very well in very specific places, but when not there, it’s just noise

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hating on hair quality is a new one for me. I can understand turning off Ray Tracing if you can have a low-end GPU, but hair quality? It's been at least a decade since I've last heard people complaining that their GPU couldn't handle Hairworks. Does any game even still use it?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It could be a twelve year old capture.

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago

Says 24 at the top

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 49 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Now... in fairness...

Chromatic abberation and lense flares, whether you do or don't appreciate how they look (imo they arguably make sense in say CP77 as you have robot eyes)...

... they at least usually don't nuke your performance.

Motion blur, DoF and ray tracing almost always do.

Hairworks? Seems to be a complete roll of the dice between the specific game and your hardware.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 106 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Out of all of these, motion blur is the worst, but second to that is Temporal Anti Aliasing. No, I don't need my game to look blurry with every trailing edge leaving a smear.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 121 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Step 1. Turn on ray tracing

Step 2. Check some forum or protondb and discover that the ray tracing/DX12 is garbage and gets like 10 frames

Step 3. Switch back to DX11, disable ray tracing

Step 4. Play the game

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 71 points 2 days ago (9 children)

motion blur is essential for a proper feeling of speed.

most games don't need a proper feeling of speed.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 58 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There is always motion blur if your monitor is shitty enough.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Soapbox1858@lemm.ee 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't mind a bit of lens flare, and I like depth of field in dialog interactions. But motion blur and chromatic aberration can fuck right off.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mind lens flare a lot because I am not playing as a camera and real eyes don't get lens flares.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I mean, lens flare does happen in the eye, just much less dramatically because there's only the one lens and everything is round. But "glare" like how the rest of your sight gets washed out because the sun is in your field of view is a manifestation of lens flare. The eyelashes can also produce some weird light artifacts that resemble camera lens flares but it's a different phenomenon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't understand who decided that introducing the downfalls of film and camera made sense for mimicking the accuracy and realism of the human eye

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’d add Denuvo to that list. Easily a 10-20% impact.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately that's not a setting most of us can just disable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (27 children)

Has the person who invented the depth of field effect for a video game ever even PLAYED a game before?

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›