this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
52 points (85.1% liked)

Games

16796 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Does this stat take release date into account? Otherwise it seems like a pretty meaningless metric. An AAA game that releases in January is going to have better sales for the year compared to one that releases in October.

[–] JowlesMcGee@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

It doesn't, but most game sales are front loaded at release. Having 8 months on the shelf still makes a difference, for sure, but it's still notable that it was number 1.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Call of Duty always release near the end, but is still the number 1 game every year.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What's crazy to me is that after the first week or two, I didn't see anyone talking about it. I kind of assumed it either flopped or was mediocre but I guess people just silently played it?

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It has that mainstream appeal as in being a brand parents know (Harry Potter) and being pretty inoffensive (i.e. no guns and blood or sex and partying) so I imagine just about every kid with a system it runs on and in the age bracket of 6-16 got it for Christmas or their Birthday despite not being on the wishlist.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

And it is actually pretty fun, if really simple in a lot of ways.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Good point!

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think that boycott did the opposite of what it was supposed to

[–] weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Something something Streisand effect.

But probably not, I'm guessing most people weren't aware there was a boycott.

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If assholes wanna play a boring game to own the libs, then that's on them, lmao. Similar to them buying barbie and bud light shit just to set it on fire when they are mad

[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Own the trans-commubity you mean. And people played it because bassically nobody could give a rats ass about the boycott..

[–] Aussiemandeus@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love qualifiers and how detailed they can get.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is really cool Rock Band

[–] meant2live218@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Looks like the original tweet ended as (Rock Band) to indicate the game that took #1 back in 2008, and either OP or the auto-titler missed the parentheses?