this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Games

37902 readers
648 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I never understood this mentality, myself.

Gamers: "I never get laid... 😩"

Also Gamers: "Women are just kitchen accessories."

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

because you think of "I never get laid" as a normal human need to connect with another person, which is what it is but they're too deep in misogyny to realize it. instead to them getting laid is a quest to complete and it involves a quest item known as a woman, not a character. so I never get laid has less of an undertone of "why can't I connect with a woman" and more of "when will we get our government mandated sex slaves"

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can buy a new toaster from the shop, why can't I buy a woman too? Does this mean Gamers are pro sex-work? Or pro indentured servitude for women more likely..

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

You cant pirate pussy, and we all know how gamers feel about subscription models.

[–] Inf_V@kbin.earth 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"but behaved more submissively towards players with a male voice" I want to know what they mean by submissive

[–] thelasttoot@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

They were less confrontational and more likely to accept direction

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

"Given the chance, they would definitely lock lips with the dominant male"

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

πŸŒπŸ‘¨β€πŸš€πŸ”«πŸ‘¨β€πŸš€

[–] Balinares@pawb.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I am in mad love with this Darmok-ass comment.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Damon's Gatsby, his glass raised

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

Darmok and Jalad when the misogynist raged.

[–] squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Obligatory footnote: EvoPsych is mostly bunk, deeply intertwined with eugenics and riddled with homophobia, sexism and rape apologia.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Traditionally, yes, but I do want to note that modern takes use it to also argue for cooperation, since working with with others is good for survival and passing on genes. They also are the first to tell people how bunk the alpha male crap is, and the fact a lone wolf is a dead wolf.

[–] CybranM@feddit.nu 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] GalacticHero@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Evolutionary psychology. I think there’s real research in the field, but it’s drowned out by charlatans who invoke its name to lend credence to their made-up bullshit without the burden of scientific rigour.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

This is part of why confidence is attractive.

It isn't that confident humans of the male reproductive caste treat women more flippantly; it's that actual competency correlates with not being as much of an insufferable whiny piece of shit.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well then the obvious conclusion is that respecting women makes you better at video games.

[–] orins@lemmings.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That’s an interesting study. It makes sense that dominance-seeking behavior follows a β€˜low-risk, high-reward’ strategy across species. The connection between status, objectification, and primate behavior is fascinating Morse Code Translatorβ€”wonder if similar patterns appear in different cultural contexts.

[–] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

I have ~10k hours in counterstrike across multi game versions and accounts. I noticed a similar thing over my years. The players doing well in a match were often neutral towards gamer girls, but the guy having a shit match would be the fastest sack of shit every time. Especially if one of the top fraggers pointed out they were being beaten by a girl.

Obviously there are always exceptions to any rules but in my anecdotal experience the guys who were confident in their abilities didn't care about women but losers would attack them just for speaking.

[–] JakobFel@retrolemmy.com -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Politicizing games is so incredibly tiresome.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

this literally has nothing to do with the game itself. it's about behavior towards other people, which is intently political.

also video games are art which makes them political as well.

the fact that you kneejerked into this reaction feels super insecure and reactionary.

[–] JakobFel@retrolemmy.com -3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

More like I'm just sick of people hijacking my favorite art form to express political/social issues or sexual fetishes, both of which are becoming too common. It's exactly why I've grown more and more in favor of retro gaming, back when neither of those expressions were anything but a fringe group of miserable individuals and weirdos that most gamers ignored. Not going to argue further, I've spoken my piece.