this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
146 points (90.1% liked)

Technology

82669 readers
3335 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toffi@piefed.social 53 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

"We've now constructed the doomsday machine from the popular novel 'Don't build the doomsday machine'"

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like the original “torment nexus” phrasing better.

[–] toffi@piefed.social 21 points 3 months ago

Ah I was quoting from memory. You're right the torment nexus line is better.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

You have an overly broad definition of "doomsday machine."

[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 35 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The result is nice and cool. It is the level of modern journalism that is disturbing.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I worry about it. Every year I see more articles with sloppy mistakes that could be caught by any half-drunk editor phoning his job in. Sites springing up publishing 90% slop clearly so someone can keep writing. Not to mention the risks to journalism in a country where the president threatens any group whose speech he doesn't like.

As (i think) Parenti said, now is the time of monsters. Cool robot though. That, genuinely, is crazy impressive.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean in this instance, if you look at the thumbnail of the author and then follow his link, he looks not a day over 16.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Im middle-aged, anyone under 30 looks like a baby to me 😅 babies can be journalists as long as they've got ethics and a good editor

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Seriously. How many ways are there to make an humanoid robot out of stainless steel and aluminium?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 28 points 3 months ago (3 children)

What clickbait. Apparently any vaguely capable humanoid robot is a "straight-up Terminator"?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

If you can't handle me at my Roy Baty you don't deserve me at my Pris Stratton

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's the most "Terminator" looking robot I've ever seen.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

So far. Since Terminators are capable humanoid robots and the goal is to make capable humanoid robots each improvement is going to look more like a Terminator. And also like every other capable humanoid robot from other sci-fi as well, good bad or neutral.

The only reason to leap to "OMG it's a Terminator!" Is to bait the clicks.

[–] BennyInc@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago

Well to be fair, they didn’t have to give it machine gun arms and red glowing eyes. But maybe that’s just me.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

It looks the a Terminator "under the hood". I doubt anyone was trying to sell a "living tissue over metal endoskeleton" kinda headline.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

They meant that in terms of infiltration they're becoming more humanoid at an exponential level

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Why does it have boobs though? Is that like extra space For batteries? Why not a bellybutton if we are Going for realism?

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because humans will put tits on anything. I watched a movie about sentient cockroaches, and the girl cockroaches all had tits.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

to be fair to the addition of bazongas, those characters are more 'humans in cockroach costumes' than 'sentient cockroaches.'

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

We all love some badongadongs tho

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Because when humans see a robot with boobs, the comments turn into "hey this robot has tits", and when they don't, the comments turn into "humanity is going to be euthanised by the machines".

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's their target market, sex dolls.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

I'd say "found the bot", but even bots are familiar with why boobs appeal to human sensibilities.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In a follow-up event to prove it was a robot, He Xiaopeng had its leg skin cut open in front of a live audience. The robot then walked off the stage.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago

that one was AI video i believe.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

What?

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

It was a Reddit comment in response to this video (Catbox alt).

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Joe Wilkins clearly has a thing for robots.

[–] confuser@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Any mention of sexy robots deserves mention of sexy robots man

Hajime sorayama

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago

That looks more like a Terminatrix

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 3 months ago

Gen 1 Synth lookin' motherfucker.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I’m not saying this because she’s a billionaire, and this is really nothing against her, her looks, or her music, but I never found Taylor Swift to be, like, sexy. She’s quite beautiful and very talented but she’s just not who comes to mind when I think of slinky sexiness.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 3 months ago

She's a bit stiff IMHO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

That's a low bar

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure this grifter had a high bar when he said that.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So they skipped the Dalek phase, huh?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago

Wheeled robots have been the norm for decades, we didn't skip that.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Didn’t Daleks have little squishy aliens inside them?

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago

Yes, Daleks are not robots, they're squishy tentacle space nazis inside mobile battle casing pepperpots that they call War Machines. The Terminator T1 however looks vaguely like such a pepperpot if you squint and are Doctor Who brained.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago (5 children)

What is the endgame here? People are supposed to buy these? To do what?

The took the fabric off a mechanical device to reveal it was a mechanical device. Disturbing?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'd buy one if it would help fight off ice agents.

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

I read ice giants and thought I’d missed a headline today

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

To do what?

Chores and other stuff we don't want to/can't do. This has been the dream for decades now, so many old encyclopedias with "future tech" chapters show robots caring for people, sometimes as caregivers (for old people, or blind etc), sometimes as entertainers.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Except regular people will struggle to afford food out whilst these will be cleaning rich people's yachts.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

"We're at a point now where robots can move more sensually than Taylor Swift."

What a weird fucking tagline on an article that insinuates a robotic dystopian future.

Although there are some weird horny undertones, so I guess it checks out. Still, weird article all around

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Press X to doubt

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

tbh, with those hips I might eventually join the robots

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

I won't die to anything wearing crocs!!

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

This seems to be the really interesting part: "..the bot also contains the “first all-solid-state battery in the industry,” as opposed to the liquid electrolyte typically found in lithium-ion batteries. Solid-state batteries are considered the “holy grail” for electric vehicle development .."

[–] jimerson@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Am I missing something, or did they just dress up a woman with a prosthetic leg to resemble an android, and remove the dressing around the prosthetic to "prove" she isn't human?

load more comments
view more: next ›