this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
452 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

83893 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Engineers are confident that shutting down the LECP will give Voyager 1 about a year of breathing room. They are using the time to finalize a more ambitious energy-saving fix for both Voyagers they call “the Big Bang,” which is designed to further extend Voyager operations. The idea is to swap out a group of powered devices all at once — hence the nickname — turning some things off and replacing them with lower-power alternatives to keep the spacecraft warm enough to continue gathering science data.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 7 points 1 hour ago

Here are Images Voyager Took.

I have no idea how to sort them by recency; I'm guessing it's not sending such expensive data anymore, but what are the most recent (and furthest) images?

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 5 points 4 hours ago

Thanks for the uplifting news!

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 80 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Why can't we be as forward thinking as the people who created the voyager probes?

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Voyager 1 was launched in 1977 - just before the Reagan era. Coincidence?

Also, and I'm still just guessing here, it's probably the culmination of the space race to the moon minus the pressure to be there before the Russians.

In other words, NASA's Golden Age.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 minute ago

Also, the tech was "just right" then. Smaller than a bus but still robust enough to survive more than a few years in space.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 50 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Jesus that is a sobering figure I did not need to see today.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

And it’s quite outdated, I think from 2022. It has become much worse since

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 19 points 6 hours ago

It's not profitable

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 29 points 7 hours ago

not enough engineers use LSD anymore because they'll lose their entire career over it and be blacklisted from government contracts forever.

the McCarthys won.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 41 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

It is amazing they can detect and communicate to something with such a weak signal so far away.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 27 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So far away that it takes an entire day to get the signal to it. The earth to the sun is 8 minutes.

And somehow we can still talk to it. It's amazing.

[–] Pman@lemmy.org 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

About 1/3 of a % of a lightyear that's hardcore that we've gotten something out that far.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

It also gives you an idea of how big space is. Lots and lots of nothing.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 6 points 4 hours ago

This, coupled with the improbable idea that it could be "found" someday, has got to be one of the most exciting and magical concepts in science ever

1-2 day ETA for an interstellar telegram lol

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 88 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What a badass little craft to have kept operating for so long. 🫡

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 11 points 4 hours ago

A truly beautiful piece of engineering

[–] mystik@lemmy.world 45 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Check out AMSAT-OSCAR 7 -- Closer to home, but launched in 1974, and still waking up when there's sun to operate. It's the oldest "operational" satellite still up there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMSAT-OSCAR_7

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

AMSAT = Amateur Satellite! Holy shit. Amateur, my ass.

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

Fucking A good on ya for the heads up. I somehow haven't heard of this one.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 71 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

NASA's Voyager engineers are like the final evolution of your uncle that keeps his 1974 Chevy C/K running at 400,000 miles. It's the same autism across an ocean of resources.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 35 points 9 hours ago

Actually basically yes. NASA has had decades of practice at minimum viable operation capability, making their spacecraft and rovers all but drag themselves along even when anything else would stop working.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 89 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

RTGs are subject to the issue of half-life - this is a consequence of that type of power source. Though, let’s be honest: we do not have any other sort of power generation technology that would be viable for literal decades on an interstellar space probe. And we definitely didn’t have a better alternative when they were launched.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 64 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

For roughly three milliseconds I thought to myself they shoulda used solar panels instead.

"Oh, wait...."

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 32 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Well they could power a lamp that shines on the solar panels.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

Use the heat from the lamp to boil some water and you're in business.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 52 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

This photo was taken after Voyager was launched, NASA didn’t have the technology yet

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

which would shut down components on its own to safeguard the probe, requiring recovery by the flight team — a lengthy process that carries its own risks.

Uhhh... how the fuck are you planning on recovering it?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 5 points 6 hours ago

New Hobby unlocked: Skyfishing

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 23 points 8 hours ago

I think what they mean is that if the thing starts shutting stuff down on its own, the process to get those things started again is tedious. While if the humans tell it to shut things down, it is all more orderly.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 4 hours ago

Hahaha I said the same thing

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 6 points 6 hours ago

Jumper cables.

Makes me wonder how the jumper cables guy is doing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 59 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

When is the next conjunction of planets that enabled the Voyager missions happening and are we preparing for it?

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The Voyager mission launched in 1977. If I recall correctly, it takes roughly 80 years for the planets to realign for that purpose. If I didn't misremember, we're about halfway through waiting.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

1977....

Roughly 80 years

If I didn't misremember, we're about halfway through waiting.

A bit more than halfway, although sometimes I am shocked by how long ago 1977 was. Wasn't it just, like, 30 years ago or so?

It can't possibly be 49 years ago, can it?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

2026 is to 1977 like 1977 is to 1928. 🫣

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

2026:1985 = 1985:1944

:(

load more comments
view more: next ›