this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
491 points (97.1% liked)

Greentext

4925 readers
1134 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 24 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, this is posted on 4chan, so I’m skeptical. It could work, I guess.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 4 points 9 hours ago

Rich is relative, easy to feel rich when they have no costs since they're living in thier parents basement.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 12 hours ago

You're not allowed to lie on 4chan or they'll ban your account.

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 24 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

No overhead, no cameras.

So if he isn't taking any pictures at all he must just be getting face pics from brides and using them as part of a prompt?

Each to their own but personally I don't understand why someone would do this. To my mind the purpose of a picture is so that you can look back at something that happened in the past or show others who weren't there.

I could understand it being fun to mess around with an AI yourself and make those kinds of pics if they're the type of thing you're into. But are people getting pics like OP is making and sharing them? Hanging them on their wall? Pretending they were real? I find that quite sad.

[–] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

People don't want photos for the memories, they want them for their socials.

I don't see a problem with anon making a profit from his shallow, vapid customers.

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 2 points 20 hours ago

Yea I mean if it sells then go for it. I'm just surprised that people at that level of narcissism are out there. Like their family are going to know the pics are bullshit if they had a real wedding or even if they faked it entirely so they're paying for something purely to pretend to strangers and acquaintances online or themselves. But maybe I should just embrace it and try to make some money out of this phenomena myself.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I understand your opinion. But then you know how scummy the wedding industry is. A flower that costs $10, suddenly costs $200 because it’s a bridal flower or whatever

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

From what I hear it's three factors: increased quality control because the customer is less likely to brush things off for their wedding, increased customer service because they will use more of your time and energy and take shit out on you, and finally because they can everyone else is doing it

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

"75% discount"

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Lol who needs a wedding? Just AI and VR the whole thing. Wedding of your dreams!

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 38 points 1 day ago

Brides paying for that is the real problem, not the fact that anon photographer is profiting off it.

I make their weddings look like their pinterest dreams, they can look as skinny and hot as they want

The only folks who are losing anything here are photoshoppers.

[–] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I crave the point in time when all content, all images, everything will be AI generated. Nothing will feel real or genuine anymore. People will lose interest and demand imperfections and crudeness again. In short, I'm all for AI acceleration because I fucking hate it

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

Just wait until AIs start being AI generated 🤓

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago

Speed running the enshittification of AI would be ideal.

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How can you tell if something is (not) real if you have never seen such a thing?

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 3 points 20 hours ago

Yea imagine being brought up in a world like that. People would either become expert content analysts or embrace being deluded.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 175 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

That seems totally fine. If he is upfront with clients that images are AI generated/uptouched, not real photos, and that is what they are paying for, that's just called running a business that innovated a saturated market. He found a way to produce a product and do it cheaper than everyone else.

Does it kinda cheapen out the experience from not capturing "real" memories? Personally I'd say yup. But that is my personal preference and not that of the clients.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Given that he does photos for 10 brides a day and still has free time, he must've been upfront about it.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t understand how because to make people look hot using ai you still need to make real pictures.

So either they just expanded the business with a popular side project or he has customers send their own pictures (which are rarely in the format, proportions, light conditions you need)

Most likely it never happened.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago
  • "Send a photo like this and I'll AI it up"
  • Client sends a photo like the one anon asked
  • anon runs the photo on AI thingy, gets some results
  • anon shows the result to client

I suspect the pics only need to have the person a similar enough pose to what they want, the AI generates the clothes and environment

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Personally I would be more disturbed if he offered and delivered real photos but never had showed up at the wedding (to my knowledge as the client).

[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

Agreed.

Does it kinda cheapen out the experience from not capturing "real" memories? Personally I'd say yup.

And as long as other people feel the same way, regular photographers will still have clients.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 136 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bride just doesn’t get to choose how many fingers she has

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or actually have photos of people? Or it actually be her.

Like ai is good, but it's not going to look like you

[–] Senseless@feddit.org 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)

With stable diffusion you can use real pictures or parts of real pictures and just let AI make up everything around it. It's not like you're generating the whole picture. You could, but it wouldn't be useful for wedding pictures.

Then again it's a greentext and as we all know: everything on the internet is true.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Photoshop has this stuff built in too nowadays, I believe.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Content-aware delete came out like 15 years ago. It's not quite the same thing, but certainly adjacent.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 19 hours ago

I'm talking about this feature: https://www.adobe.com/au/products/photoshop/generative-fill.html

You could just take a photo of a person and then let Photoshop generate a whole wedding around them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, there are some people who don't have 5 fingers (4and a thumb for you weirdos).

as part of your prompt you can specify digits and use negative prompts to lower the number of digits. On my 2070 I can push out an image every 17ish seconds so having a better cards means you can push out more faster. If the image has an odd digit you can not use it for upscaling.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With this method, I manage to get 14-fingered hands reliably. After that, the results get worse. 15-fingered hands work about 50% of the time. Asking for more fingers usually results in the summoning of a demon octopus, which is annoying to get rid of.

The nurseries and childcare facilities I work with are not thrilled but I love my job.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Pure chaotic neutral

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] match@pawb.social 53 points 1 day ago

even better, anyone can have equally bland photos of marrying whoever they want! your creepy stalker can imagine himself marrying you too!

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why bother with the wedding at all? Just sit on the couch alone and swipe through fake pictures of someone who doesn't even look like you at a wedding that never happened! That's where the real savings kick in!

On the plus side, at least Anon can now dispell any rumors about his love life with photos of his TOTALLY REAL marriage to his 14 year old waifu who is actually an 800 year old wizard!

[–] Laser@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm wondering the same thing, and want to believe the story is fake.

Our wedding wasn't super fancy, but why would I want fake pictures of something that never happened? It doesn't make sense to me at all

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 1 points 12 hours ago

I mean, you always see this around new technology/fads, all the time. When it's new or ongoing, there's either an excitement at the novelty or being in the minority of people doing it; people see the chance to do some of the things that fix limitations of the current process and there's always those willing to try that out.

For a day that's already compounded with expectation and often hyped as a sort of zenith in one's life, it's easy to see being able to customize things exactly to the way you're having them play out in your head as really alluring.

And, once the hype dies down or we get used to the novel aspects, all the things you mentioned with get greater focus in the general attention, again, and people will likely value those things more (because, ultimately, you're not wrong).

But I do feel like this is a pretty consistent phenomenon with almost any trend and you always see an uptick of adopters because the ability to solve some pain points is novel.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

When we were picking out a photographer for our wedding, we heard a piece of advice that had stuck with me over the years. Which was to think of wedding photos as an appreciating asset that gets more valuable over time.

You can look at your photos the week after the wedding and they might not seem all that special. The memories are still fresh and not much has changed. But then when you look at them on your 10th or 20th anniversary , it brings up those memories you had forgotten about. It reminds you of happy times with friends and relatives that might be dead now. Fast forward to 50 years later and those pictures might be the most priceless thing that you have.

So yeah... AI photos might fill that Instagram need of modern weddings, but long-term feel completely worthless. Hoping this story is fake as well, but wouldn't be surprised if there's some truth to it.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

why would I want fake pictures of something that never happened?

Seems to be a popular part of tourism in the age of Instagram.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Someday, filling our minds with these illusions is going to catch up with us

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol, keep doing it, they should adapt. Stable diffusion is literally free.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is. But if you fully and openly disclose that's what you're doing when selling a individual a personalized product for literally their own enjoyment, I don't see the harm.

Sure, the client isn't going to tell people that weren't there that it's all generated, but what's the problem? Someone might believe you were media-attractive 10 years ago at your wedding?

Photography probably put a lot of portrait painters out of business, but it didn't destroy painting as an art form.

Grab that bag, man.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I mean there's still the environmental harm.

[–] agelord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Money is not cringe, however.

[–] Atlas_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 2 points 22 hours ago

Money is kinda cringe tbh

  • Karl Marx
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

The stuff you can buy with money isn't though.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›