this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
279 points (96.0% liked)

Greentext

6252 readers
924 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 4 points 29 minutes ago

Be human.

Have billions of tons of atmosphere directly above you

Don't explode

Make it make sense

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not pressure under the wings, it's fucking Bernoulli sucking on top of them.

(So, yes, sure, it is gay, but it's not fake.)

[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

When you nut, but Bernoulli keep sucking...

"goofy plane"

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 16 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Next time you see a plane imaging two hooks in the middle of the wings, a crane lifting up the plane with these two hooks and shaking it.

This give you a good approximation of what the forces in the plane are, and once you picture that you might think that there is no way the plane can hold up in this situation. Yet it does.

It's more like putting the plane in a bowl of jello and then shaking the bowl.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

...fake and gay

Hey now. Let's not blame gay people for the common-sense-defying demon-wizard sorcery that engineers get up to when someone threatens to take away their calculators and caffeine.

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 4 points 54 minutes ago

Bruh some of the earliest planes were literally called biplanes. The gay has been complicit in aviation demon magic since the very beginning.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 38 points 9 hours ago

The funniest thing is that the aerospace engineers who made this possible are just as much hopeless dysfunctional wrecks as the rest of us.

Don't forget about the screens they put in the windows

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 119 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This perfectly encapsulates how anti vaxxers and others think. "Ive thought it through and it cantnbebright". Its incredible how we can have access to vast amounts of information and yet live in an age of gleeful ignorance.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 46 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

>Town of 100 people
>Everyone has $50
>Everyone stores Money In Town Bank
>Total bank balance of everyone: $5000
>Bank lends $1000 to a farmer to buy new equipment
>Merchant who sold the equipment deposits $1000 into bank.
>There is now $6000 total deposited in the bank
>1000 just came out of thin air
Money is fake and gay

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 hours ago

I remember this classic philosophical quandary of our time, but in a different form.

Classic.

[–] pm_me_your_thoughts@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

debt: am I am joke to you?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Rich people never pay off debt.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago

They let the poor pay it off for them

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago

Future economists are going to make so much fun of us for thinking $1000 was created here.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 72 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Also weird how giant steel tankers float on the ocean. Especially when they're weighed down by all that cargo. It's practically unbelievable. I throw a tiny rock in the ocean, and it sinks...but not those giant steel boats? /s

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 35 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

No, ocean water can't sink steel boats

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago

But it melt steel beams?

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Well... When you put one of those huge tankers in the water, it will move a LOT of water out of the way.

As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.

As you keep loading up the tanker with more cargo, it will go deeper into the water right? But this means that it is pushing more water out of the way (the water that used to be where the boat now is), which balances out the weight because that creates more buoyancy.

A rock, on the other hand, is heavier than the water that it displaces, so it sinks like a tanker whose front fell off.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Since we are pedantic, what you say isn't true.

The tanker weights exactly as much as the weight of the water that it displaces. They are in balance. You describe it yourself. The tanker sinks deeper if it becomes heavier and swims more up as it becomes lighter.

The measure of "boat swims" is not the weight of the displaced water. It is wether there is some boat wall left sticking out of the water to keep more water from entering and displacing the air that keeps the submerged volume in weight balance with the water.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So we have rising sea levels because there's so many big ships in the ocean, got it.

[–] Glent@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

And fish poops

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.

But steel is heavier than water

[–] goodeye8@fedia.io 25 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

If you take 1kg of steel and 1kg of water, which is heavier? That's right, steel is heavier.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If she weighs more than a duck, then she’s made of wood.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

We shall use the larger scales!

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Metal is heavier than water. Virtually every containber is fille to the brim with products, now I don't know you but most everything we buy is heavier than water.

It's clear they have some kind of extra propulsion in those, most likely magnetic anti gravitation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 31 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Well I must admit, when the plane is resting on the ground, the wings droop down a lot. Then when airborne it's the other way around, the wings curve upwards as the fuselage hangs from them. In my mind nothing that big made of metal should be able to flex that much.

But since I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I have learned about material science, airplane design and engineering. And I have found out that it does indeed flex that much. It also isn't that thick, since it's only a skeleton wrapped with a very thin layer of metal. In fact if it didn't flex as much, it would be weaker and not stronger.

So the thing I really learnt is never to trust intuition when it comes to things like this.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago

https://youtu.be/Ai2HmvAXcU0

Those wings can take a lot of abuse

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 hours ago

In my mind nothing that big made of metal should be able to flex that much.

You can observe on a small scale that many things made of metal do, e.g. a saw or a spring.

[–] Aliktren@lemmy.world 38 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Glue, is how the wings stay on, really good glue

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

hot glue or super glue? I mean super glue has super in the name

[–] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Welding is just extreme hot glue, the hottest glue

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

You will trigger a lot of people if you say that welding is gluing

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 26 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I remember a quote from an A380 pilot saying the plane doesn't look like it should be able to fly.

Even the people that fly them know they don't look like a flying object.

[–] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago) (1 children)

I get it. That plane is so disgusting the earth tries to keep it as far as possible from the ground.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No, thats the helicopter. It's said that it does not fly, but is repulsed by the earth because it is the hubris of man manifest.

[–] dave@feddit.uk 1 points 30 minutes ago (1 children)

Planes fly because aerodynamics.

Helicopters fly because money.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago* (last edited 12 minutes ago)

Helicopters leave the ground because God has gazed upon them, and became angered when He saw them among His beasts, on the lands of His creation. God then decided to expel the helicopters from His earthly kingdom to flutter helplessly in His skies. God did this to punish Man, whose hubris led him to climb into the unholy creation. The Lord would then strike down the abomination fluttering in His skies, condemning the heretics that had climbed aboard in the belief that they could fool Him.

Thus the name "Jesus nut".

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 22 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Wait till this guy find out that there are more planes in the ocean than there are submarines in the sky

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Well, technically pregnant women can be submarines

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I've read your comment and I'd like you to know that I don't approve of it.

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago

Well, I could've said male seahorses if that makes you feel better? Are they still submarines if you put them in an aquarium on a plane, but the plane crashes into the ocean?

[–] match@pawb.social 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

at takeoff i like to imagine that the plane is going into a massive underground subway network with really nice screens along the sides

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›