this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
348 points (96.5% liked)

Greentext

6258 readers
1168 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 hour ago

My faith in humanity is so low that I 100% believe there are planes are not real truthers that's out there.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 23 points 5 hours ago

i remember when i thought these jokes were funny. now i know tons of people actually think like this and it's depressing rather than funny.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 28 points 5 hours ago

Be human.

Have billions of tons of atmosphere directly above you

Don't explode

Make it make sense

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 25 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not pressure under the wings, it's fucking Bernoulli sucking on top of them.

(So, yes, sure, it is gay, but it's not fake.)

[–] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

When you nut, but Bernoulli keep sucking...

"goofy plane"

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 29 minutes ago

I'm 100% convinced this was never a battle of airframes and manufacturers and simply was down to: "No, sir/ma'am, I will not fly the derpy plane into combat. Can't do it. YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE REST OF THE PILOTS WILL LAUGH AT ME"

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 27 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Next time you see a plane imaging two hooks in the middle of the wings, a crane lifting up the plane with these two hooks and shaking it.

This give you a good approximation of what the forces in the plane are, and once you picture that you might think that there is no way the plane can hold up in this situation. Yet it does.

It's more like putting the plane in a bowl of jello and then shaking the bowl.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

...fake and gay

Hey now. Let's not blame gay people for the common-sense-defying demon-wizard sorcery that engineers get up to when someone threatens to take away their calculators and caffeine.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 33 minutes ago

G.I.N.A.S.F.S.

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago

Bruh some of the earliest planes were literally called biplanes. The gay has been complicit in aviation demon magic since the very beginning.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 133 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This perfectly encapsulates how anti vaxxers and others think. "Ive thought it through and it cantnbebright". Its incredible how we can have access to vast amounts of information and yet live in an age of gleeful ignorance.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 57 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

>Town of 100 people
>Everyone has $50
>Everyone stores Money In Town Bank
>Total bank balance of everyone: $5000
>Bank lends $1000 to a farmer to buy new equipment
>Merchant who sold the equipment deposits $1000 into bank.
>There is now $6000 total deposited in the bank
>1000 just came out of thin air
Money is fake and gay

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 9 hours ago

I remember this classic philosophical quandary of our time, but in a different form.

Classic.

[–] pm_me_your_thoughts@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

debt: am I am joke to you?

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 2 points 37 minutes ago

Balance:

Each of 98 Townspeople: $50

The Merchant: $1050

The Farmer: -$950

So, the 98 towns people and the merchant all wants to withdraw.

???

Now you have a riot outside of a bank.

Congrats, you destroyed a Town with #Banking 🫠

Or alternatively.

The Banker just gaslight the town to mob-lynch the Farmer the good ol' capitalism way.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Rich people never pay off debt.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 9 hours ago

They let the poor pay it off for them

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 hours ago

Future economists are going to make so much fun of us for thinking $1000 was created here.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 42 points 14 hours ago

The funniest thing is that the aerospace engineers who made this possible are just as much hopeless dysfunctional wrecks as the rest of us.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 83 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Also weird how giant steel tankers float on the ocean. Especially when they're weighed down by all that cargo. It's practically unbelievable. I throw a tiny rock in the ocean, and it sinks...but not those giant steel boats? /s

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 45 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No, ocean water can't sink steel boats

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 7 points 9 hours ago

But it melt steel beams?

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago (13 children)

Well... When you put one of those huge tankers in the water, it will move a LOT of water out of the way.

As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.

As you keep loading up the tanker with more cargo, it will go deeper into the water right? But this means that it is pushing more water out of the way (the water that used to be where the boat now is), which balances out the weight because that creates more buoyancy.

A rock, on the other hand, is heavier than the water that it displaces, so it sinks like a tanker whose front fell off.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (4 children)

Since we are pedantic, what you say isn't true.

The tanker weights exactly as much as the weight of the water that it displaces. They are in balance. You describe it yourself. The tanker sinks deeper if it becomes heavier and swims more up as it becomes lighter.

The measure of "boat swims" is not the weight of the displaced water. It is wether there is some boat wall left sticking out of the water to keep more water from entering and displacing the air that keeps the submerged volume in weight balance with the water.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Since we're being extra pedantic, what I said was:

As long as the tanker weights less than the weight of all that water it displaced, it will float.

This is factually true, and you didn't disprove it.

As for "boat wall sticking out of the water", that's just grasping at straws man. If that boat is fully waterproof, like a submarine, the definition holds up. Or if you consider that water entering the boat adds to the boat weight, then again it will hold true as it will weigh more than the water it displaces.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 12 points 12 hours ago

Don't forget about the screens they put in the windows

[–] Aliktren@lemmy.world 42 points 16 hours ago (8 children)

Glue, is how the wings stay on, really good glue

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 32 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Well I must admit, when the plane is resting on the ground, the wings droop down a lot. Then when airborne it's the other way around, the wings curve upwards as the fuselage hangs from them. In my mind nothing that big made of metal should be able to flex that much.

But since I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I have learned about material science, airplane design and engineering. And I have found out that it does indeed flex that much. It also isn't that thick, since it's only a skeleton wrapped with a very thin layer of metal. In fact if it didn't flex as much, it would be weaker and not stronger.

So the thing I really learnt is never to trust intuition when it comes to things like this.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago

https://youtu.be/Ai2HmvAXcU0

Those wings can take a lot of abuse

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 27 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I remember a quote from an A380 pilot saying the plane doesn't look like it should be able to fly.

Even the people that fly them know they don't look like a flying object.

[–] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee 14 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I get it. That plane is so disgusting the earth tries to keep it as far as possible from the ground.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

No, thats the helicopter. It's said that it does not fly, but is repulsed by the earth because it is the hubris of man manifest.

[–] dave@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Planes fly because aerodynamics.

Helicopters fly because money.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Helicopters leave the ground because God has gazed upon them, and became angered when He saw them among His beasts, on the lands of His creation. God then decided to expel the helicopters from His earthly kingdom to flutter helplessly in His skies. God did this to punish Man, whose hubris led him to climb into the unholy creation. The Lord would then strike down the abomination fluttering in His skies, condemning the heretics that had climbed aboard in the belief that they could fool Him.

Thus the name "Jesus nut".

[–] DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 53 minutes ago

No, it's called the Jesus nut because if it fails, only Jesus can save you now.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 23 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Wait till this guy find out that there are more planes in the ocean than there are submarines in the sky

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›