this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
282 points (99.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17853 readers
583 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 17 minutes ago

Now how much do they pay for kidnapping people?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 2 hours ago

Good on her. Fuck the cops. Too bad the police spend must of their budgets on lawsuits instead of, ya'know, vetting and training.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

I think it's hilarious that this comment section is full of support for the woman AND laughter over her sex toys. Think about it.

[–] daw@feddit.org 3 points 4 hours ago

I love that this had any sort of consequence. I do not thinkthis would have been an option in Germany.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 16 points 7 hours ago

Good. Seriously, I hope such actions will be met with complaints and lawsuits everywhere.

Sexual life is a very sensitive and intimate subject, and it's bad enough that she even had policemen invade it by opening the box (though this in particular is obviously a necessary part of police operations), let alone make a laughing matter out of it.

In general, though, I hope we will be able to eventually get more open about such things, so that it would be seen as a regular set of household items, even if it's hidden from plain sight.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 90 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I bet she's gonna buy so many sex toys with that money. I hope she does. (In a positive, not-creepy way.)

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 28 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Would you rather cum from a bunch of toys for $3K total or one $3K sex toy that should in theory be mind blowing?

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Easy answer there, the women have already spoken (pictured: sybian inventor Dave Lampert).

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 12 hours ago

Never looked into the inventor of these things. Was not expecting English Mr Rogers.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 12 hours ago

I've seen these things in action. They're worth it.

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

I mean, sure, a little pricey, but some chairs cost as much and they're not specifically designed to make baby squirt like a startled octopus.

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 34 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

How could there be 10,000 different kicks

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 22 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Cue montage of Bubba from Forest Gump listing all 10,000 types of kicks.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Roundhouse kick, side kick, chop kick, kick stew...

[–] syreus@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

10 angles @ 10 speeds @ 10 heights @ 10 follow-ups

10,000 kicks

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 20 hours ago

That's the fun part. They aren't all necessarilly effective.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 18 hours ago

The 3k one but only if it comes with replaceable parts. I wouldn't want to keep using it after it gets too crusty.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 64 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] don@lemmy.ca 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Campfire?

Campfire.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 23 hours ago
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 18 points 23 hours ago
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago

...in the form of sex shop gift card

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world -4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

FFS do they really have to write headlines that imply the exact opposite of what happened? At first read, I thought the woman had been made to pay £3k, not that she had gotten paid £3k.

I know "headlinese" is a thing and all, but is adding the word "got" really that inconvenient?

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 28 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I understood it just fine. "Got paid" sounds very informal. "Is paid" or "was paid" would be slightly clearer.

The opposite would be "fined" or "pays".

[–] MajorSauce@sh.itjust.works 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I would have went with awarded.

Edit: This is partly a joke because of the context.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The past tense "paid" doesn't go with "laughs." Are you complaining about a misunderstanding you had for the time it took you to read 3 more words? Or do you not understand tense?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago

In case you didn't figure it out, the headline is ambiguous between her giving or receiving the money. Reading "three more words" doesn't change that.