this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
185 points (91.9% liked)

Technology

74957 readers
3531 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/45730883

With more than 80,000 AI-powered cameras across the U.S., Flock Safety has become one of cops’ go-to surveillance tools and a $7.5 billion business. Now CEO Garrett Langley has both police tech giant Axon and Chinese drone maker DJI in his sights on the way to his noble (if Sisyphean) goal: Preventing all crime in the U.S.

In a windowless room inside Atlanta’s Dunwoody police department, Lieutenant Tim Fecht hits a button and an insectile DJI drone rises silently from the station rooftop. It already has its coordinates: a local mall where a 911 call has alerted the cops to a male shoplifter. From high above the complex, Fecht zooms in on a man checking his phone, then examines a group of people waiting for a train. They’re all hundreds of yards away, but crystal clear on the room-dominating display inside the department’s crime center, a classroom-sized space with walls covered in monitors flashing real- time crime data—surveillance and license plate reader camera feeds, gunshot detection reports, digital maps showing the location of cop cars across the city. As more 911 calls come in, AI transcribes them on another screen. Fecht can access any of it with a few clicks.

Twenty minutes down the road from Dunwoody, in an office where Flock Safety’s cameras and gunshot detectors are arrayed like museum pieces, 38-year-old CEO and cofoun­der Garrett Langley presides over the $300 million (estimated 2024 sales) company responsible for it all. Since its founding in 2017, Flock, which was valued at $7.5 billion in its most recent funding round, has quietly built a network of more than 80,000 cameras pointed at highways, thoroughfares and parking lots across the U.S. They record not just the license plate numbers of the cars that pass them, but their make and distinctive features—broken windows, dings, bumper stickers. Langley estimates its cameras help solve 1 million crimes a year. Soon they’ll help solve even more. In August, Flock’s cameras will take to the skies mounted on its own “made in Amer­ica” drones. Produced at a factory the company opened earlier this year near its Atlanta offices, they’ll add a new dimension to Flock’s business and aim to challenge Chinese drone giant DJI’s dominance.

Langley offers a prediction: In less than 10 years, Flock’s cameras, airborne and fixed, will eradicate almost all crime in the U.S. (He acknowledges that programs to boost youth employment and cut recidivism will help.) It sounds like a pipe dream from another AI-can-solve- everything tech bro, but Langley, in the face of a wave of opposition from privacy advocates and Flock’s archrival, the $2.1 billion (2024 revenue) police tech giant Axon Enterprise, is a true believer. He’s convinced that America can and should be a place where everyone feels safe. And once it’s draped in a vast net of U.S.-made Flock surveillance tech, it will be.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 minutes ago

The only way you could actually come close to eliminating all crime would be if you eliminated poverty. But that would make the rich less rich, so not gonna happen.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

it can eliminate all crime by locking up all citizens

I gotta admit, that is a great idea!

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 20 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Before reading anything else, I'm going all in on this only mentioning violent or public crimes and ignoring financial or corporate crimes

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Financial and corporate mistakes are not crimes! How dare you, these are decent people, shame on you!

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 hours ago

Cameras + Drones + AI. Yup, nothing to solve the real crimes.

[–] bier@feddit.nl 21 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Americans when you talk about gun control: NOOO mah freedom, I need it to protect myself from the government.

Americans when you tell them a private company is going to monitor and track every citizen, basically making a dystopian police state: I have nothing to hide so it's fine.

I feel Europe is basically the other way around, less guns, but more privacy.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 12 minutes ago

eu is trying to turn into surveillance state too. There is some group that is CONSTANTLY pushing this chat control law, that would make encryption illegal, if i have understood it correctly. They have been held back for now, but they can just keep trying until they succeed.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I was going to say have you looked at the shit the U.K. is doing lately, but sometimes I forget they voted their way into authoritarianism

I will say though, I'm very surprised there have been so many local governments within Europe that seem to be allowing this kind of shit.

https://www.dw.com/en/german-police-expands-use-of-palantir-surveillance-software/a-73497117

[–] bier@feddit.nl 2 points 3 hours ago

Yeah this is where the EU has a problem, because our intelligence agencies don't really have great alternatives. For police we can probably just go without palantir

[–] xcel@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Don't be so sure about the privacy part. Sure Europe so far seems to have had a privacy first policy, but that's about to change in the coming days https://fightchatcontrol.eu/

[–] bier@feddit.nl 7 points 5 hours ago

Yeah we (Europeans) should also constantly keep fighting for our privacy and freedom. Thanks for sharing the link I'm glad the Netherlands is against it.

[–] unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Anyone have any intel on how well these cameras hold up against buckshot?

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm just as curious about the drones. Do they have a 'stop-and-hover' mode if you jam them temporarily, or do they set down? As to the cameras, well... it's a nice fantasy that you'd get away with it, but unless there's a civil war going on, you're going to be caught shooting buckshot at them. That's what they're truly trying to build, and they've gotten there if they can monitor your car from nearly at your home until you leave it (the car), track you walking to wherever you commit the crime and back to your car, then track you as you drive away until you get nearly home.

Oh I agree that you won't be able to fire your shotgun in a large urban area, but if you're someplace less densely populated I can imagine being able to drive up from behind in the middle of the night...

It's too bad there isn't an easier way to deal with this problem, especially in the instances where the cameras are being installed without consent.

Akin to having foreign adversaries set up a spy network within our borders, and instead of being punished for it, many law enforcement agencies are choosing to buy the subscription plan!

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

that picture looks like a master race advertisement.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

🎶 It's beginning to look a lot like a dystopia

Everywhere you go

There's drones flying around

Recording all the sounds

And reporting on your every move

Liberty is just the cost I have to pay for muh safety! /s

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Oh yeah, I can't wait to become a digital slave...

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 hours ago

since there have been laws, there have been criminals

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They’re going to build a society in which all basic needs such as access to food, water, education, housing, and health care are provided to all people making the need for most crime unnecessary???

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 20 points 7 hours ago

That would actually be cheaper than what they're trying to do.

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 9 hours ago

Oh look, it's the main villain in a Cyberpunk novel.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

adding to the list: SHIA LABEOUF

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 11 hours ago

Is this ~~damage control~~ propaganda after the popular Benn Jordan video?

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 11 hours ago

Make trains run by the clock, eh?

He acknowledges that programs to boost youth employment and cut recidivism will help.

Even better. State programs of giving people bullshit jobs earning their gratitude, loyalty and readiness to join, say, some paramilitary force?

He’s convinced that America can and should be a place where everyone feels safe. And once it’s draped in a vast net of U.S.-made Flock surveillance tech, it will be.

A knife can be used both for cutting bread and for cutting off heads. And they are.

A gun can be used both for stopping a very bad person and for stopping a very good person. And they are.

And a surveillance net of drones (that can also carry weapons) can be used both for reducing crime and reducing dissent. And it will be.

There are moments when I'm glad I live in a backwards (relatively to the US) country.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 21 points 12 hours ago

Are they going to place cameras in the white house? Because that would be a start.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 16 points 12 hours ago

No they don't.

They think saying they do will make them rich.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 37 points 14 hours ago

I'll believe it when they catch a McDonald's manager shorting his employees' wages.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 34 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Before we try to manage the entire population at large, let's just eliminate crime in prisons and jails. That's a controlled environment, but it's rife with crime. If we can't fix a controlled environment, how can we possibly fix an open environment?

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 11 hours ago

They don't want to fix it, they want power intended to help fix it, similar to what prison guards have, outside of prisons.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 36 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

So they're gunna use AI to find ways to better fund public education and harm reduction programs to keep people out of prisons while eliminating the pretext for hyper-militarized policing forces? Right?

...Right?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 91 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Thinks it can ~~eliminate all crime in America~~ make a shit load of money

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 104 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

glances at white house

might wana start with that... 👀

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›