this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
963 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21016 readers
676 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Interesting, but not sure the data proves the headline. The best they can say is that such searches originating from red states are a significant portion of all US searches.

Obsessed: no definition or evidence to support this.

Republicans: not a definitive connection, though plausible.

I don't want to say this is irresponsible reporting, but it's not factually accurate either.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah not to mention some of the data for searches for porn coming from states with age age verification checks are using VPN's to other states. (Like 80% of porn hub traffic from Louisiana dropped after the age verification laws, and VPNs went up across the board, as in those users likely were not just showing up as users from other states)

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean yo say correlation is not causation?! How dare you, sir!? I challenge thee to a bartitsu duel!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Who just searches on google for porn? wtf? That can't be a legitimate sample of the public, can it?

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Completely rational question if you, like me, also willingly assume rational thought from any member of the general public.

I watch a lot of true crime and you would not believe how many people commit a heinous crime and immediately start building the case against themselves googling shit. The American public is functionally brain damaged.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where are you going? Some sticky TOR server or something?

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I usually don't have to worry about it because your parents let me watch.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

They are like REALLY good with computers too. The last one also did this cute hiss when a Tesla would drive past.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

Ha! Next thing you are going to tell me is that gay meet up apps like Grinder get overloaded at Republican events.

[–] mimavox@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Of course they are.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

I am honestly not surprised.

I knew some people in the calvinist bible-belt regions in Holland (they're very strict, a bit similar to mormon, almost amish-like in terms of strictness except not having any aversion to technology). For example washing a car on sunday is absolutely out of the question and most people wear black those days. If you don't show up in church the whole village will hate you.

Anyway so the video rental shops in those regions were buzzing with the worst kinda porn. One of my friends managed video rental shop and he said the relative porn amount was 2-3x bigger than in the city areas.

This is for people for whom porn is highly illegal according to their religion. Somehow it causes some kind of attraction for them.

I'm very atheist and sex-positive and very much into kink, polyamory etc but it was never because of the 'forbidden' element for me. So I find it hard to understand that. But I've definitely seen it being a big thing yes.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Anything that is taboo is attractive.

Easiest way to make kids not interested in something is for their parents to do it. Easiest way to get them interested is for their parents to forbid them from it.

Pot consumption among teens is plummeting, now that it's legalized and teens see it as something that their lame parents like doing, rather than something cool and illegal.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

Muah hah haa millennials, we done it again. Killed the goddamn pot industry.

[–] Bloefz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yes the exact same happened here in Holland 30 years ago when it was legalised. It became a deeply uncool "stoner" thing and none of my friends did it.

Unfortunately the countries around us kept calling hell all those years until it finally became a common thing.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago (31 children)

I don't give a damn what kind of porn people watch. I do care that this colors their perspective on how trans people actually live. Most of us aren't sex workers. And most of us that are don't do it by choice. We're just people trying to live our lives. This kind of thinking is incredibly dangerous, as it leads to believing that someone just being themselves in public is an act of sexual exhibitionism. I didn't transition as a sex thing. My life is not a costume. I transitioned and have lived my entire adult life as myself, worked my entire career and built my entire life around my transitioned name and gender. Rather than a 24/7 drag act, most days I'm wearing jeans and hoodie.

We're just trying to live our lives in peace. But a bunch of perverts are using their porn habits to inform their moral judgments about an entire class of people.

[–] DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

This ties into a bigger issue where almost nothing related to sexuality can ever be healthy or normal to many conservatives.

Sex to these conservatives is inherently deviant and filthy. Making conscious life decisions related to sexuality or sexual identity will never be just a life decision. It will be equivalent to actively engaging in sexual acts.

Being trans to them is actively paedophilic because it exposes children to the concept of sexuality and gender. Sex ed will be paedophilic to them because it does the same. Each person's actions are not the sole thing that defines them, but also their position in society as dictated by "what it has always been". Men have always led households by marrying women and having kids, therefore men that don't are a threat.

Conservatism is quite black or white when it comes to things like identity or introspection. It is an ideology that very frequently wages war on self questioning and exploration in exchange for compliance and conformism. It's why many conservatives hate universities, scientists and partially why they hate immigrants. The entire ideology grows by appealing to people who do not want to be intellectually challenged. It's especially attractive to those that don't want to understand other ways of thinking.

Conservatism as an ideology always exploits the greatest potential weakness of the left wing: naivety, and presents itself as the "responsible" or "reasonable" solution to a reckless and harmful left wing. They frame things like empathy and humanitarianism as weaknesses rather than virtues.

It's why most of the conservative rhetoric revolves around "being taken advantage of" or "being scammed by" this or that group. They love stories about immigrants exploiting the system, cheating or stealing because it proves their worldview that what's foreign and unknown is out to get them. It is an ideology driven by fear.

And the biggest problem is that, unlike progressivism (which also has its ideological vices and weaknesses), conservatism never seeks to help the weak or empower the vulnerable. Instead it seeks to maintain the hierarchy and keep people in their place. In the US that translates to keeping immigrants weak, keeping black people down, keeping women in the kitchen, keeping white men ahead, keeping the US as an imperial power, and keeping its allies subservient.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget femboys and the entire set of gay porn. Double down on that closeted "Christian values".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

probably also gay porn too, since thier skinhead/nazi categories

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 202 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Ironically, they’re treating trans women the same way they treat cis women—as sexual objects who don’t deserve bodily autonomy.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I mean, I'd say this is the opposite of ironic, it is extremely expected and logically follows from how the conservative brain/worldview works.

Basically it just boils down to 'being horny is a sin, sin is an evil, supernatural force or state of being, that acts with will, or comes from deliberate, intentional agency... thus anything that makes me horny, I must dominate, control, defeat, as an external enemy, and also deny that it makes me feel horny, to avoid looking like I have fallen (in) to sin.'

When you institutionalize the idea of a fundamental, carnal, human desire as supernaturally evil, everything relating to how you interact with or experience that desire becomes a shameful perversion, and then you have to hide that perversion by one means or another, and those means are often conquest, conquest involves 'othering' the enemy.

For all their talk of personal responsibility, their entire worldview is designed, with many layers of artificial constructs, to shield them from critical self-reflection, to channel them away from actually understanding themselves.

How can you possibly be responsible for yourself, if you do not even understand yourself, why you do the things you do?

To them, what is most important is the performance of conformity to a hierarchichal group identity role.

That's their 'gender'.

Not self-expression.

[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s ironic because they insist that trans women aren’t women, but then they treat them like women (in this aspect, at least). That’s irony.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah! Yes!

That, that element of it, that is absolutely ironic.

I guess I just instantly went into a 'theory of mind' kind of angle, derp.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I've seen this pointed out before. They say that trans women are men, but they don't treat them like men. They treat them like women.

This reminds me of a friend of mine whose trans daughter attending elementary school had a bully calling her a "boy" and then chasing her around and trying to kiss her. Really, kid? Do you like to kiss boys now? Obviously, sexual harassment isn't cool at any age, and that needs to be dealt with, but it just goes to show that even at that young age deep down they know the difference.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It’s equal opportunity alright.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Yeah, that's so unbelievably not fucking surprising. A weird amount of harassment I've gotten for being trans has been kinda (or occasionally extremely) sexual. Also the redder the area the more I get street harassment.

ETA: Oh upon reading the article, the city I'm thinking of (Lexington, KY, I basically couldn't take a walk without being catcalled there) is in the top 10 cities.

And yeah, anti trans bigotry is interesting because it seems to be an alliance of exterminationist bigotry ("x people should not exist or should be hidden and we should work towards that goal", examples of targeted groups include disabled people, Jewish people, and gay people) and supremacist bigotry ("x people are our lessers and must be forced into their place beneath us", anti black racism is the classic example). You have plenty of transphobes who just want us gone no matter what, but you also have quite a few who think our place is as discreet sex workers and are mad that we are insisting we deserve to live in society as equals and do whatever work we want. They were fine with us as prostitutes, but not as mechanics, as shameful side pieces but how dare we say we deserve to be spouses.

That perspective of us is deeply entwined in the insistence that anything pertaining to us is sexual. They look at us and reduce us solely to the lens of sex then condemn us for it. Then when some of us internalize that our only value as people is as sex objects they point and say "see look, we told you".

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Also explains why all the porn of us calls us slurs. I hate it.

(Seriously, it's so hard finding trans porn that feels like it's for trans people instead of for people that want to dehumanize us)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is this the racism heatmap?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Its also like they all hate undocumented immigrants but only hire them for work.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

It's just research!

load more comments
view more: next ›