this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
567 points (83.6% liked)

Technology

73734 readers
4131 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 4 points 54 minutes ago

Its neither for me, i just dont like getting wrong information and AI is giving tons of it.

Also its not intelligent it just fucking sounds so

[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 1 points 33 minutes ago

Hear me out: what i, this is a plot to boost vegan numbers. Given latest stats huge portion of population does not use or see any use in AI - i.e. can be claimed AI vegans so in aggregation reports those could be viewed as a subset of Vegans... resulting in undeniable truth that 90%+ of population are vegan now

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

AI isn't the meat, jack. It's slop.

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

AI vegan is not a thing and shall never be.

The correct term is Technophile. Anyone obsessed with tech would never hand it off to a third party to do when they can go through the joy of learning themselves.

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

I'm technophobic. Fucking clankers

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 hours ago

We let environmentalism become an individual issue, and that was a mistake. Can we not do this for AI? It's a society-wide problem, not something you can solve by measuring your own personal AI footprint.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

how to belittle and minimize a very serious thing: call any protesters of it a " ___ vegan"

[–] Sergio@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

They are "journalism vegans". They are choosing to abstain from actual journalism for clickbaiting, herd mentality, and personal lack of skill reasons.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago

Why are you dissing on vegans? Veganism is legit, bro.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

So normal decent human beings

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Thats 99% lemmy users

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

I hate this timeline

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

I want to avoid it but with google making sure that search results get worse and worse I'm in a bit of a pickle. Other search engines still feel lile they're a bit behind though

[–] Malek061@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, it's not better and also shows slop

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You can at least turn off its built-in summaries. But some filtering to detect AI generated articles would be nice.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago

You can ask it to turn off the summaries. It still shows them but you can ask.

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I’ve been using DuckDuckGo for over a decade, the results are fine, and !bangs are extremely useful for piping queries directly to specific sites, !w for wikipedia, !aw for archwiki, etc. The Duck.ai function is a recent addition, and it can be easily disabled if you don’t want it. By default it doesn’t usually pop up by itself. You can also use lite.duckduckgo.com for a much leaner search and absolutely no AI.

[–] astutemural@midwest.social 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Just switched to noai.duckduckgo.com. Thanks stranger!

[–] danzabia@infosec.pub 2 points 1 hour ago

ddg is great :)

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Ah, I was unaware of that shortcut, thanks for the heads up, and you’re welcome! 🦆

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

https://udm14.com/

You can also get a search extension in firefox (probably others as well but I haven't looked)

It essentially strips the bullshit out and just shows you search results.

[–] Fish@midwest.social 8 points 6 hours ago

If you're willing to pay money then Kagi is a great alternative. They claim they don't collect or share your data. Though, Kagi isn't very good for local search results and probably never will be.

[–] Inkstainthebat@pawb.social 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You've probably heard this before but do consider alternatives like Startpage and Qwant. It's not flawless but I've found it's definitely better.

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago

I'm gonna go a step further and recommend searx :)

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 35 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

I refuse to use it because it's shit.

We are not the same.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 11 points 10 hours ago

Yup, these things are still garbage for >90% of all applications people are jamming them into. Breathed a sigh of relief when my company CEO said he doesn't see us using AI for more than can center routing for at least the next several years.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 18 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

I just don’t have a use for it. I already am generative AI.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

you aren't artificial tho lol

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

[citation needed]

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 49 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

i wonder if they came up with such term to mock those who dont want to use ai and possibly actual vegans on the side.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 31 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

They use to mock us with “Luddite” but the Technologists looked into that actual movement (rather than the caricature) and agreed, “yeah sure, like them”. That took the sting out of the pejorative, so they picked another mocked group to connect it with.

[–] Univ3rse@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Maybe we should be more like the luddites, starting with data centers.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 91 points 15 hours ago (19 children)

Abstaining from a thing does not make one a vegan. That's not how any of this works.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 hours ago

But it makes people come off as extremely annoying. So that's working.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 14 hours ago

This is the dumbest shit I've ever read. Refusing to submit to corpo ratfuckery isn't a lifestyle choice. It's common sense.

load more comments
view more: next ›