this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
94 points (92.0% liked)

Games

43089 readers
1738 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] bluesocks@lemmings.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The main problem with Peter is that he engages with his fans.

Any developer that does this is always asking for a world of hurt, mostly because you guys are a bunch of actual morons.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I ultimately don't think he's a bad guy so I'm rooting for him to show us wrong.

I think he always just believed in his vision too much and didn't realise that he and his team couldn't end up delivering on it. And then he'd be so excited about what he's working on that he just couldn't not share it with others. I don't think he ever intended to mislead.

I know there's the milo thing but with that I feel like he still thought they could do it in the end but Microsoft just needed something right there and then to show. I think that issue ends up more squarely on whoever sold him on what the hardware could do and he had not yet fully hit those walls of limitations enough to realise they weren't coming down at all. (I also think this goes for Sean Murray too when he did the talk show circuit that Sony put him on - although without the hardware stuff and more on whether or not they could deliver on time since they've shown what they wanted was actually possible with future updates)

[–] WALLACE@feddit.uk 5 points 14 hours ago

This is true. Black and White might have been awkward and buggy but it pioneered a whole sub-genre.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

I'm taking the bait again for old times sake if nothing else. I hope he proves everyone wrong, it will be a fantastic end to his saga, and we'll get something great.

When we're let down again, we'll still have something fun to play with and getting tricked by Molyneuxs big ideas will be like opening a time capsule from a more civilised age.

[–] orenj@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 1 day ago

lmao he's doing it again

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Another overpromise to put previous overpromises to shame.

Godus anyone?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

The funniest thing he ever tried to sell was Milo.

Basically an AI character game before even shitty LLM generative AI existed. You had to have been the dumbest, most gullible rube to have believed anything about that shit.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 18 points 2 days ago

It's obvious that demo was 99% fake and the eventual end product would have been way more scripted and simple than what he hyped it to be (I mean, it's Molyneux). But he's also been backstabbed by Microsoft on that one.

The Kinect prototype he was working with was not the Kinect that was eventually released. At one point Microsoft cut corners and removed the internal processor that was suposed to make Kinect work, leaving the console to deal with all the extra computation. It was barely possible to make a simple Kinect game not run like shit, making something relatively smart and responsive would have been a pipe dream.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I was fairly young at the time and wondered how they would try to pull this off. To the surprise of no one who was a little older than me they simply didn‘t. The only thing that was pulled was the project itself.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I'm 1000% sure Molyneaux is gonna try to use AI to develop as much of this new game as possible.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I detest this son of a bitch because he is just such a lying sack of shit.

[–] porksnort@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And I loved Godus. Such engaging gameplay

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

IIRC I played it a little and it was just mobile microtransaction hell after a certain point, no?

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

It's been awhile since I played Godus, but I don't remember micro transactions. May have forgotten, but remember it just being a super simplified version of populous. I only played in early access though, not sure on changes or if it ever had a full release.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 54 points 2 days ago

Sounds like wild overpromising

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 78 points 2 days ago

Again with the overpromising.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago

Press X to doubt.

[–] emb@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago

Sounds like a big promise.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago

Not the Onion material.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I actually forgot about this clown. The Elon Musk of gaming.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 19 points 2 days ago

Peter Molyneux says Masters of Albion will make up for decades of ‘overpromising on things’

When you "make up" for something you've done, it's not up to you to decide when you've "made up" for it. It's up to the people that you crossed. What a presumptuous thing to say.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

Oh yeah, falling for Molyneuxs hype again. Take me back to when things made sense. Thats the good stuff.

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I don't believe him...

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm not sure that Pete has actually played a game he wasn't directly involved with since like... 2010?

What we've seen of his new game really isn't that interesting in the modern landscape. Maybe a decade ago it would have been fresh and had enough of a hook to compete for gamers' attention, but today? It looks pretty forgettable.

Then when you consider Molyneux's propensity towards feature creep, it's probably safe to assume that even if the game is a 'success' by most conventional metrics, it won't be profitable because the amount of money spent to make the damn thing will have been completely insane.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I can't even finish the trailer with how boring and stale it looks. Calling it pretty forgettable is stating it nicely... I'm convinced this game will be released and nobody will even notice. He even sounds bored out of his mind himself.

Maybe there is a market of mobile gamers gone PC that he's trying to capture, much like Godus? I don't see how this will entice anyone else.

Basically he has no clout left, even though I still wish for a good Black and White sequel, B&W 2 doesn't count.

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Arguably the issue isn't so much in the gaming landscape as the history behind the game.

His previous "game" was a crypto/NFT scam where they sold land (as NFTs) to people who were speculating they could make IRL money from renting out this "land" to plebs.

It was a complete failure. I played it for an hour on a free sever (or something similar). The gameplay was complete shit, it was tedious and grindy (like mobile titles), a repetitive and uninspired experience, graphics were ugly, the multiplayer elements didn't really make much sense.

All the NFT buyers got destroyed while Molyneux collected tens of millions.

Allegedly that money was used to "invest" in Masters of Albion.

But the real kicker is that Masters of Albion seems to be based on that NFT scam game engine (which IMO is beyond saving).

I wouldn't be surprised if this a managed exit from his previous crypto/NFT scam "game".

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Scamming a bunch of NFT idiots is an arguably better funding model than promising a bunch of stuff to Kickstarter backers that you aren't going to deliver on.

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I would prefer if neither one was a thing.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Carnie promoter says carnie shit, more news at 5

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

He's like that shitty husband that keeps cheating and getting caught, and keeps saying he has changed.

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 14 points 2 days ago

You have to be kidding me lmfao

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The best thing that's come from Peter Molyneux is the Peter Molydeux spoof account, that actually has some genuinely interesting ideas amongst all the silliness.

[–] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's pretty funny and it's been around for many years. I remember seeing it in the early to mid 2010s.

There was a really funny one that went something along the lines of "Imagine if your played as the asphalt in a racing game."

[–] BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah that one was made into a real game in the molyjam, or whatever the game jam based on that twitter was. You play as the road, and the cars racing on it have ever shifting emotional states depending on how they're doing. I'll see if I can dig up a link

[–] NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is he making a promise about promises?

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I always cringe a little bit when someone says a person has 'become a parody of themselves'... but honestly, what else is there to say about Molyneaux?

Peter Molyneaux really has become a parody of Peter Molyneaux.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Alexa play Little Lies