this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
591 points (98.2% liked)

Greentext

4925 readers
1158 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 4 points 47 minutes ago

I enjoy posts like this where Americans get hooked into the legalities of what guns can be bought, the ammo, whether it's permitted in some states, etc.

It's a movie about a robot from the future which time travelled. And people are questioning the legalities of buying guns in the 80's.

[–] Yokozuna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Question about the pistol here, is the mount reliable enough to keep it zero'd and accurate? That's a huge pistol and the kickback on the slide would be nuts, lots of energy moving around there to knock something loose, or at least a little off center, I feel like.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

Modern day, sure no problem. Today's micro red dots can be mounted to the moving slides themselves and survive.

In the 1980s? Maaaybe...

The laser in the movie is mounted to the frame by way of the grip, so it will shake around much less than if it were on the slide. Mounting optics to the frame is how competition guns were (and sometimes still are) set up.

The question comes down to the durability of a laser device made in the 80s. The movie's laser was a specially made prop. On one hand it was made by the precursor to Surefire which is known for quality equipment, on the other hand I doubt the movie cared about it actually holding a zero.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Well, he did come from the future after all. It wouldn't be hard for Skynet to dig through criminal records, court cases, sales records, bank info, etc... and pinpoint where to get an optimal shopping experience for this mission.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 25 minutes ago

Part of the plot was that Skynet didn't have great records. The terminator had to use a phone book and go down the line killing Sarah Conners because it didn't know which one was the target

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

I mean kinda, but you gotta sit for a background check

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 8 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

I mean the accent isn't really relevant (though it would probably get a comment) but the large quantity of guns and ammo would raise suspicion.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

American Police: "Want to buy some guns? Go right ahead."

Also American Police: "Withdrawing more than $10,000 in cash to pay for it? Get'm boys!"

[–] sunstoned@lemmus.org 5 points 3 hours ago

That depends heavily on where you are in the country.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

the large quantity of guns and ammo would raise suspicion.

iirc there a law where more than 1,000 rounds in one purchase would have a federal note that someone bought a lot of ammo, so people just started buying 999 bullets instead lmao

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 1 points 14 minutes ago

yeah, and I should have been clearer that I more meant the gun part. buying a lot of guns isn't that concerning, but buying a bunch at once is.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

He also asks for an "Uzi 9mm" a full-auto machine gun, which you could NOT just buy over the counter at a retail gun store.

[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 17 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

There was a ban on selling machine guns to civilians that was passed in 1986.

The original Terminator film came out in 1984. So now? Yes, but then?

Probably accurate.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

Not entirely. Machineguns have, since 1934, been required to be registered with the federal government, and for a normal person individually require a federal approval to buy (a "stamp").

What happened in 1986 was the machinegun registry changed from open to closed. This means, that new machineguns are no longer added to the registry, meaning that for the average person (ie not somebody involved in the industry with their own special licensing) the number of machineguns for sale is limited and supply over time will always be going slowly down.

The process for buying a machinegun is as simple as buying any other NFA item like a silencer/suppressor or an SBR. The cost has skyrocketed thanks to limited supply.

[–] zzx@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There are still transferrable Mac 10s out there though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 hours ago

In the 80s it was. Nowadays you'd have to pass a background check.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 33 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

1984? In some states, yeah, It would have been that easy.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

In 1984, a full auto would still have been on an NFA registry. Open, rather than closed like today, but still not a simple one step sale.

This is of course, fact checking the finer points of gun law in a movie about a time traveling robot.

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 hours ago

Damn not very 1984 of them

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

If you find a one in a million firearms store who buys their own stock and resells out back illegally, it still is.

Also some pawn shops, technically anything made before a certain date is an Antique and skips a lot of regulations.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

They'll pry my right to sell a late medieval firearm to children from my cold dead hands.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 32 points 7 hours ago
[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

lol no. Maybe in the past but now there's a background check and often a mandatory waiting period before you can just walk out with a gun.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 4 hours ago

In fairness you could probably just walk out with it if you do what Arnie does in the movie...

[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

"Phased plasma rifle in the 40-watt range."

"Hey, just what ya see, pal."

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

"Hey wait a minute. Those haven't been invented yet. What are you? Some kind of time traveling killer robot with incomplete historical records. Hang on just one second pal, I gotta go to the back."

load more comments
view more: next ›